Ezetimibe (3574)
Categories, Drug
Classes, Brand Names & Cost Of Therapy
CATEGORIES: Hypercholesterolemia;
Hyperlipidemia; Sitosterolemia; Pregnancy; FDA Approved 2002 Oct
Drug Classes:
Antihyperlipidemics
Brand Names: Zetia
DescriptionEzetimibe is in a class of
lipid-lowering compounds that selectively inhibits the intestinal absorption of
cholesterol and related phytosterols. The chemical name of ezetimibe is
1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3(R)-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3(S)-hydroxypropyl]-4(S)-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-azetidinone.
The empirical formula is
C24H21F2NO3. Its molecular weight
is 409.4.
Ezetimibe is a white, crystalline powder that
is freely to very soluble in ethanol, methanol, and acetone and practically
insoluble in water. Ezetimibe has a melting point of about 163°C and is
stable at ambient temperature. Zetia is available as a tablet for oral
administration containing 10 mg of ezetimibe and the following inactive
ingredients: croscarmellose sodium, lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate,
microcrystalline cellulose, povidone, and sodium lauryl sulfate.
Clinical PharmacologyBackground
Clinical studies have demonstrated that
elevated levels of total cholesterol (total-C), low density lipoprotein
cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (Apo B), the major protein constituent
of LDL, promote human atherosclerosis. In addition, decreased levels of high
density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are associated with the development of
atherosclerosis. Epidemiologic studies have established that cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality vary directly with the level of total-C and LDL-C and
inversely with the level of HDL-C. Like LDL, cholesterol-enriched
triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL),
intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL), and remnants, can also promote
atherosclerosis. The independent effect of raising HDL-C or lowering
triglycerides (TG) on the risk of coronary and cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality has not been determined.
Ezetimibe reduces total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and
TG, and increases HDL-C in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Administration
of ezetimibe with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is effective in improving
serum total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, TG, and HDL-C beyond either treatment alone. The
effects of ezetimibe given either alone or in addition to an HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have not been
established.
Mode of
Action
Ezetimibe reduces blood cholesterol by
inhibiting the absorption of cholesterol by the small intestine. In a 2 week
clinical study in 18 hypercholesterolemic patients, ezetimibe inhibited
intestinal cholesterol absorption by 54%, compared with placebo. Ezetimibe had
no clinically meaningful effect on the plasma concentrations of the fat-soluble
vitamins A, D, and E (in a study of 113 patients), and did not impair
adrenocortical steroid hormone production (in a study of 118 patients).
The cholesterol content of the liver is
derived predominantly from 3 sources. The liver can synthesize cholesterol,
take up cholesterol from the blood from circulating lipoproteins, or take up
cholesterol absorbed by the small intestine. Intestinal cholesterol is derived
primarily from cholesterol secreted in the bile and from dietary
cholesterol.
Ezetimibe has a mechanism of action that
differs from those of other classes of cholesterol-reducing compounds (HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors, bile acid sequestrants [resins], fibric acid derivatives,
and plant stanols).
Ezetimibe does not inhibit cholesterol
synthesis in the liver, or increase bile acid excretion. Instead, ezetimibe
localizes and appears to act at the brush border of the small intestine and
inhibits the absorption of cholesterol, leading to a decrease in the delivery
of intestinal cholesterol to the liver. This causes a reduction of hepatic
cholesterol stores and an increase in clearance of cholesterol from the blood;
this distinct mechanism is complementary to that of HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitors (see CLINICAL STUDIES).
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
After oral administration, ezetimibe is
absorbed and extensively conjugated to a pharmacologically active phenolic
glucuronide (ezetimibe-glucuronide). After a single 10 mg dose of ezetimibe to
fasted adults, mean ezetimibe peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of
3.4-5.5 ng/ml were attained within 4-12 hours (Tmax).
Ezetimibe-glucuronide mean Cmax values of 45-71 ng/ml were achieved
between 1 and 2 hours (Tmax). There was no substantial deviation
from dose proportionality between 5 and 20 mg. The absolute bioavailability of
ezetimibe cannot be determined, as the compound is virtually insoluble in
aqueous media suitable for injection. Ezetimibe has variable bioavailability;
the coefficient of variation, based on intersubject variability, was 35-60% for
AUC values.
Effect of Food on
Oral Absorption
Concomitant food administration (high fat or
non-fat meals) had no effect on the extent of absorption of ezetimibe when
administered as ezetimibe 10 mg tablets. The Cmax value of ezetimibe
was increased by 38% with consumption of high fat meals. Ezetimibe can be
administered with or without food.
Distribution
Ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide are highly
bound (>90%) to human plasma proteins.
Metabolism and
Excretion
Ezetimibe is primarily metabolized in the
small intestine and liver via glucuronide conjugation (a phase II reaction)
with subsequent biliary and renal excretion. Minimal oxidative metabolism (a
phase I reaction) has been observed in all species evaluated.
In humans, ezetimibe is rapidly metabolized to
ezetimibe-glucuronide. Ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide are the major
drug-derived compounds detected in plasma, constituting approximately 10-20%
and 80-90% of the total drug in plasma, respectively. Both ezetimibe and
ezetimibe-glucuronide are slowly eliminated from plasma with a half-life of
approximately 22 hours for both ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide. Plasma
concentration-time profiles exhibit multiple peaks, suggesting enterohepatic
recycling.
Following oral administration of
14 C-ezetimibe (20 mg) to human subjects, total
ezetimibe (ezetimibe + ezetimibe-glucuronide) accounted for approximately 93%
of the total radioactivity in plasma. After 48 hours, there were no detectable
levels of radioactivity in the plasma.
Approximately 78% and 11% of the administered
radioactivity were recovered in the feces and urine, respectively, over a 10
day collection period. Ezetimibe was the major component in feces and accounted
for 69% of the administered dose, while ezetimibe-glucuronide was the major
component in urine and accounted for 9% of the administered dose.
Special Populations
Geriatric
Patients
In a multiple dose study with ezetimibe given
10 mg once daily for 10 days, plasma concentrations for total ezetimibe were
about 2-fold higher in older (≥65 years) healthy subjects compared to
younger subjects.
Pediatric
Patients
In a multiple dose study with ezetimibe given
10 mg once daily for 7 days, the absorption and metabolism of ezetimibe were
similar in adolescents (10-18 years) and adults. Based on total ezetimibe,
there are no pharmacokinetic differences between adolescents and adults.
Pharmacokinetic data in the pediatric population <10 years of age are not
available.
Gender
In a multiple dose study with ezetimibe given
10 mg once daily for 10 days, plasma concentrations for total ezetimibe were
slightly higher (<20%) in women than in men.
Race
Based on a meta-analysis of multiple-dose
pharmacokinetic studies, there were no pharmacokinetic differences between
Blacks and Caucasians. There were too few patients in other racial or ethnic
groups to permit further pharmacokinetic comparisons.
Hepatic
Insufficiency
After a single 10 mg dose of ezetimibe, the
mean area under the curve (AUC) for total ezetimibe was increased approximately
1.7-fold in patients with mild hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh score 5-6),
compared to healthy subjects. The mean AUC values for total ezetimibe and
ezetimibe were increased approximately 3- to 4-fold and 5- 6-fold,
respectively, in patients with moderate (Child-Pugh score 7-9) or severe
hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 10-15). In a 14 day, multiple-dose study
(10 mg daily) in patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency, the mean AUC
values for total ezetimibe and ezetimibe were increased approximately 4-fold on
Day 1 and Day 14 compared to healthy subjects. Due to the unknown effects of
the increased exposure to ezetimibe in patients with moderate or severe hepatic
insufficiency, ezetimibe is not recommended in these patients (see
CONTRAINDICATIONS and PRECAUTIONS, Hepatic Insufficiency).
Renal
Insufficiency
After a single 10 mg dose of ezetimibe in
patients with severe renal disease (n=8; mean CRCL ≤30 ml/min/1.73 m
2 ), the mean AUC values for total ezetimibe,
ezetimibe-glucuronide, and ezetimibe were increased approximately 1.5-fold,
compared to healthy subjects (n=9).
Drug InteractionsDrug Interactions
See also DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Ezetimibe had no significant effect on a
series of probe drugs (caffeine, dextromethorphan, tolbutamide, and IV
midazolam) known to be metabolized by cytochrome P450 (1A2, 2D6, 2C8/9 and 3A4)
in a "cocktail" study of 12 healthy adult males. This indicates that ezetimibe
is neither an inhibitor nor an inducer of these cytochrome P450 isozymes, and
it is unlikely that ezetimibe will affect the metabolism of drugs that are
metabolized by these enzymes.
|
Warfarin:
Concomitant administration of ezetimibe (10 mg
once daily) had no significant effect on bioavailability of warfarin and
prothrombin time in a study of 12 healthy adult males. |
|
Digoxin:
Concomitant administration of ezetimibe (10 mg
once daily) had no significant effect on the bioavailability of digoxin and the
ECG parameters (HR, PR, QT, and QTc intervals) in a study of 12 healthy adult
males. |
|
Gemfibrozil:
In a study of 12 healthy adult males,
concomitant administration of gemfibrozil (600 mg twice daily) significantly
increased the oral bioavailability of total ezetimibe by a factor of 1.7.
Ezetimibe (10 mg once daily) did not significantly affect the bioavailability
of gemfibrozil. |
|
Oral
Contraceptives: Coadministration of
ezetimibe (10 mg once daily) with oral contraceptives had no significant effect
on the bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol or levonorgestrel in a study of 18
healthy adult females. |
|
Cimetidine:
Multiple doses of cimetidine (400 mg twice
daily) had no significant effect on the oral bioavailability of ezetimibe and
total ezetimibe in a study of 12 healthy adults. |
|
Antacids:
In a study of 12 healthy adults, a single dose
of antacid (Supralox 20 ml) administration had no significant effect on the
oral bioavailability of total ezetimibe, ezetimibe-glucuronide, or ezetimibe
based on AUC values. The Cmax value of total ezetimibe was decreased
by 30%. |
|
Glipizide:
In a study of 12 healthy adult males,
steady-state levels of ezetimibe (10 mg once daily) had no significant effect
on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glipizide. A single dose of
glipizide (10 mg) had no significant effect on the exposure to total ezetimibe
or ezetimibe. |
|
HMG-CoA Reductase
Inhibitors: In studies of healthy
hypercholesterolemic (LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl) adult subjects, concomitant
administration of ezetimibe (10 mg once daily) had no significant effect on the
bioavailability of either lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin,
or fluvastatin. No significant effect on the bioavailability of total ezetimibe
and ezetimibe was demonstrated by either lovastatin (20 mg once daily),
pravastatin (20 mg once daily), atorvastatin (10 mg once daily), or fluvastatin
(20 mg once daily). |
|
Fenofibrate:
In a study of 32 healthy hypercholesterolemic
(LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl) adult subjects, concomitant fenofibrate (200 mg once
daily) administration increased the mean Cmax and AUC values of
total ezetimibe approximately 64% and 48%, respectively. Pharmacokinetics of
fenofibrate were not significantly affected by ezetimibe (10 mg once
daily). |
|
Cholestyramine:
In a study of 40 healthy hypercholesterolemic
(LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl) adult subjects, concomitant cholestyramine (4 g twice
daily) administration decreased the mean AUC values of total ezetimibe and
ezetimibe approximately 55% and 80%, respectively. |
Clinical StudiesPrimary
Hypercholesterolemia
Ezetimibe reduces total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and
TG, and increases HDL-C in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Maximal to near
maximal response is generally achieved within 2 weeks and maintained during
chronic therapy.
Ezetimibe is effective in patients with
hypercholesterolemia, in men and women, in younger and older patients, alone or
administered with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Experience in pediatric and
adolescent patients (ages 9-17) has been limited to patients with homozygous
familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) or sitosterolemia.
Experience in non-Caucasians is limited and
does not permit a precise estimate of the magnitude of the effects of
ezetimibe.
Monotherapy
In two, multicenter, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, 12 week studies in 1719 patients with primary
hypercholesterolemia, ezetimibe significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B,
and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to placebo (see TABLE 1). Reduction in
LDL-C was consistent across age, sex, and baseline LDL-C.
TABLE 1 Response to Ezetimibe in Patients With Primary
Hypercholesterolemia (Mean* % Change From Untreated Baseline)
| |
|
|
Pooled Data |
| |
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
Studies 1 & 2 |
| |
Placebo |
Ezetimibe |
Placebo |
Ezetimibe |
Placebo |
Ezetimibe |
| |
n=205 |
n=622 |
n=226 |
n=666 |
n=431 |
n=1288 |
|
Total-C |
+1 |
-12 |
+1 |
-12 |
0 |
-13 |
|
LDL-C |
+1 |
-18 |
+1 |
-18 |
+1 |
-18 |
|
Apo B |
-1 |
-15 |
-1 |
-16 |
-2 |
-16 |
|
TG* |
-1 |
-7 |
+2 |
-9 |
0 |
-8 |
|
HDL-C |
-1 |
+1 |
-2 |
+1 |
-2 |
+1 |
|
*
For triglycerides, median % change from
baseline. |
|
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
|
|
Ezetimibe significantly reduced total-C,
LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and increased HDL-C compared to placebo.
|
Combination With
HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Ezetimibe
Added to On-Going HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Therapy
In a multicenter, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, 8 week study, 769 patients with primary
hypercholesterolemia, known coronary heart disease or multiple cardiovascular
risk factors who were already receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
monotherapy, but who had not met their NCEP ATP II target LDL-C goal were
randomized to receive either ezetimibe or placebo in addition to their on-going
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy.
Ezetimibe, added to on-going HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor therapy, significantly lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and
increased HDL-C compared with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor administered alone
(see TABLE 2). LDL-C reductions induced by ezetimibe were generally consistent
across all HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
TABLE 2 Response to Addition of Ezetimibe to On-Going
HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Therapy* in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia
(Mean% Change From Treated Baseline)
| |
Treatment (Daily Dose)
|
| |
On-Going HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor
+ Placebo§ |
On-Going HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor
+ Ezetimibe§ |
| |
n=390 |
n=379 |
|
Total-C |
-2 |
-17 |
|
LDL-C |
-4 |
-25 |
|
Apo B |
-3 |
-19 |
|
TG |
-3 |
-14 |
|
HDL-C |
+1 |
+3 |
|
*
Patients receiving each HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor: 40% atorvastatin, 31% simvastatin, 29% others (pravastatin,
fluvastatin, cerivastatin, lovastatin). |
|
For triglycerides, median % change from
baseline. |
|
Baseline - on an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
alone. |
|
§
Ezetimibe + HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
significantly reduced Total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and increased HDL-C
compared to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor alone. |
Ezetimibe
Initiated Concurrently With an HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor
In four, multicenter, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, 12 week trials, in 2382 hypercholesterolemic patients,
ezetimibe or placebo was administered alone or with various doses of
atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, or lovastatin.
When all patients receiving ezetimibe with an
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor were compared to all those receiving the
corresponding HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor alone, ezetimibe significantly
lowered total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and, with the exception of pravastatin,
increased HDL-C compared to the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor administered alone.
LDL-C reductions induced by ezetimibe were generally consistent across all
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. (See TABLES 3-6, footnote.)
TABLE 3 Response to Ezetimibe and Atorvastatin
Initiated Concurrently in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia (Mean* %
Change From Untreated Baseline)
|
Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Daily Dose) |
n |
Total-C |
LDL-C |
Apo B |
TG* |
HDL-C |
|
Placebo |
60 |
+4 |
+4 |
+3 |
-6 |
+4 |
|
Ezetimibe |
65 |
-14 |
-20 |
-15 |
-5 |
+4 |
|
Atorvastatin 10 mg |
60 |
-26 |
-37 |
-28 |
-21 |
+6 |
|
Ezetimibe + atorvastatin 10 mg
|
65 |
-38 |
-53 |
-43 |
-31 |
+9 |
|
Atorvastatin 20 mg |
60 |
-30 |
-42 |
-34 |
-23 |
+4 |
|
Ezetimibe + atorvastatin 20 mg
|
62 |
-39 |
-54 |
-44 |
-30 |
+9 |
|
Atorvastatin 40 mg |
66 |
-32 |
-45 |
-37 |
-24 |
+4 |
|
Ezetimibe + atorvastatin 40 mg
|
65 |
-42 |
-56 |
-45 |
-34 |
+5 |
|
Atorvastatin 80 mg |
62 |
-40 |
-54 |
-46 |
-31 |
+3 |
|
Ezetimibe + atorvastatin 80 mg
|
63 |
-46 |
-61 |
-50 |
-40 |
+7 |
|
Pooled data (all atorvastatin
doses) |
248 |
-32 |
-44 |
-36 |
-24 |
+4 |
|
Pooled data (all ezetimibe + atorvastatin
doses) |
255 |
-41 |
-56 |
-45 |
-33 |
+7 |
|
*
For triglycerides, median % change from
baseline. |
|
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
|
|
Ezetimibe + all doses of atorvastatin pooled
(10-80 mg) significantly reduced Total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and increased
HDL-C compared to all doses of atorvastatin pooled (10-80 mg).
|
TABLE 4 Response to Ezetimibe and Simvastatin
Initiated Concurrently in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia (Mean* %
Change From Untreated Baseline)
|
Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Daily Dose) |
n |
Total-C |
LDL-C |
Apo B |
TG* |
HDL-C |
|
Placebo |
70 |
-1 |
-1 |
0 |
+2 |
+1 |
|
Ezetimibe |
61 |
-13 |
-19 |
-14 |
-11 |
+5 |
|
Simvastatin 10 mg |
70 |
-18 |
-27 |
-21 |
-14 |
+8 |
|
Ezetimibe + simvastatin 10 mg
|
67 |
-32 |
-46 |
-35 |
-26 |
+9 |
|
Simvastatin 20 mg |
61 |
-26 |
-36 |
-29 |
-18 |
+6 |
|
Ezetimibe + simvastatin 20 mg
|
69 |
-33 |
-46 |
-36 |
-25 |
+9 |
|
Simvastatin 40 mg |
65 |
-27 |
-38 |
-32 |
-24 |
+6 |
|
Ezetimibe + simvastatin 40 mg
|
73 |
-40 |
-56 |
-45 |
-32 |
+11 |
|
Simvastatin 80 mg |
67 |
-32 |
-45 |
-37 |
-23 |
+8 |
|
Ezetimibe + simvastatin 80 mg
|
65 |
-41 |
-58 |
-47 |
-31 |
+8 |
|
Pooled data (all simvastatin
doses) |
263 |
-26 |
-36 |
-30 |
-20 |
+7 |
|
Pooled data (all ezetimibe + simvastatin
doses) |
274 |
-37 |
-51 |
-41 |
-29 |
+9 |
|
*
For triglycerides, median % change from
baseline. |
|
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
|
|
Ezetimibe + all doses of simvastatin pooled
(10-80 mg) significantly reduced Total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and increased
HDL-C compared to all doses of simvastatin pooled (10-80 mg). |
TABLE 5 Response to Ezetimibe and Pravastatin
Initiated Concurrently in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia (Mean* %
Change From Untreated Baseline)
|
Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Daily Dose) |
n |
Total-C |
LDL-C |
Apo B |
TG* |
HDL-C |
|
Placebo |
65 |
0 |
-1 |
-2 |
-1 |
+2 |
|
Ezetimibe |
64 |
-13 |
-20 |
-15 |
-5 |
+4 |
|
Pravastatin 10 mg |
66 |
-15 |
-21 |
-16 |
-14 |
+6 |
|
Ezetimibe + pravastatin 10 mg
|
71 |
-24 |
-34 |
-27 |
-23 |
+8 |
|
Pravastatin 20 mg |
69 |
-15 |
-23 |
-18 |
-8 |
+8 |
|
Ezetimibe + pravastatin 20 mg
|
66 |
-27 |
-40 |
-31 |
-21 |
+8 |
|
Pravastatin 40 mg |
70 |
-22 |
-31 |
-26 |
-19 |
+6 |
|
Ezetimibe + pravastatin 40 mg
|
67 |
-30 |
-42 |
-32 |
-21 |
+8 |
|
Pooled data (all pravastatin
doses) |
205 |
-17 |
-25 |
-20 |
-14 |
+7 |
|
Pooled data (all ezetimibe + pravastatin
doses) |
204 |
-27 |
-39 |
-30 |
-21 |
+8 |
|
*
For triglycerides, median % change from
baseline. |
|
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
|
|
Ezetimibe + all doses of pravastatin pooled
(10-40 mg) significantly reduced Total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG compared to all
doses of pravastatin pooled (10-40 mg). |
TABLE 6 Response to Ezetimibe and Lovastatin Initiated
Concurrently in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia (Mean* % Change From
Untreated Baseline)
|
Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Daily Dose) |
n |
Total-C |
LDL-C |
Apo B |
TG* |
HDL-C |
|
Placebo |
64 |
+1 |
0 |
+1 |
+6 |
0 |
|
Ezetimibe |
72 |
-13 |
-19 |
-14 |
-5 |
+3 |
|
Lovastatin 10 mg |
73 |
-15 |
-20 |
-17 |
-11 |
+5 |
|
Ezetimibe + lovastatin 10 mg |
65 |
-24 |
-34 |
-27 |
-19 |
+8 |
|
Lovastatin 20 mg |
74 |
-19 |
-26 |
-21 |
-12 |
+3 |
|
Ezetimibe + lovastatin 20 mg |
62 |
-29 |
-41 |
-34 |
-27 |
+9 |
|
Lovastatin 40 mg |
73 |
-21 |
-30 |
-25 |
-15 |
+5 |
|
Ezetimibe + lovastatin 40 mg |
65 |
-33 |
-46 |
-38 |
-27 |
+9 |
|
Pooled data (all lovastatin
doses) |
220 |
-18 |
-25 |
-21 |
-12 |
+4 |
|
Pooled data (all ezetimibe + lovastatin
doses) |
192 |
-29 |
-40 |
-33 |
-25 |
+9 |
|
*
For triglycerides, median % change from
baseline. |
|
Baseline - on no lipid-lowering drug.
|
|
Ezetimibe + all doses of lovastatin pooled
(10-40 mg) significantly reduced Total-C, LDL-C, Apo B, and TG, and increased
HDL-C compared to all doses of lovastatin pooled (10-40 mg). |
Homozygous
Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
A study was conducted to assess the efficacy
of ezetimibe in the treatment of HoFH. This double-blind, randomized, 12 week
study enrolled 50 patients with a clinical and/or genotypic diagnosis of HoFH,
with or without concomitant LDL apheresis, already receiving atorvastatin or
simvastatin (40 mg). Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups,
atorvastatin or simvastatin (80 mg), ezetimibe administered with atorvastatin
or simvastatin (40 mg), or ezetimibe administered with atorvastatin or
simvastatin (80 mg). Due to decreased bioavailability of ezetimibe in patients
concomitantly receiving cholestyramine (see PRECAUTIONS), ezetimibe was dosed
at least 4 hours before or after administration of resins. Mean baseline LDL-C
was 341 mg/dl in those patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg or simvastatin
80 mg alone and 316 mg/dl in the group randomized to ezetimibe plus
atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg or simvastatin 40 or 80 mg. Ezetimibe, administered
with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 and 80 mg statin groups, pooled),
significantly reduced LDL-C (21%) compared with increasing the dose of
simvastatin or atorvastatin monotherapy from 40 to 80 mg (7%). In those treated
with ezetimibe plus 80 mg atorvastatin or with ezetimibe plus 80 mg
simvastatin, LDL-C was reduced by 27%.
Homozygous
Sitosterolemia (Phytosterolemia)
A study was conducted to assess the efficacy
of ezetimibe in the treatment of homozygous sitosterolemia. In this
multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8 week trial, 37 patients with
homozygous sitosterolemia with elevated plasma sitosterol levels (>5 mg/dl)
on their current therapeutic regimen (diet, bile-acid-binding resins, HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors, ileal bypass surgery and/or LDL apheresis), were
randomized to receive ezetimibe (n=30) or placebo (n=7). Due to decreased
bioavailability of ezetimibe in patients concomitantly receiving cholestyramine
(see PRECAUTIONS), ezetimibe was dosed at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after
resins were administered. Excluding the 1 subject receiving LDL-apheresis,
ezetimibe significantly lowered plasma sitosterol and campesterol, by 21% and
24% from baseline, respectively. In contrast, patients who received placebo had
increases in sitosterol and campesterol of 4% and 3% from baseline,
respectively. For patients treated with ezetimibe, mean plasma levels of plant
sterols were reduced progressively over the course of the study. The effects of
reducing plasma sitosterol and campesterol on reducing the risks of
cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have not been established.
Reductions in sitosterol and campesterol were
consistent between patients taking ezetimibe concomitantly with bile acid
sequestrants (n=8) and patients not on concomitant bile acid sequestrant
therapy (n=21).
Indications And UsagePrimary
Hypercholesterolemia
Monotherapy
Ezetimibe, administered alone is indicated as
adjunctive therapy to diet for the reduction of elevated total-C, LDL-C, and
Apo B in patients with primary (heterozygous familial and non-familial)
hypercholesterolemia.
Combination
Therapy With HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Ezetimibe, administered in combination with an
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, is indicated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the
reduction of elevated total-C, LDL-C, and Apo B in patients with primary
(heterozygous familial and non-familial) hypercholesterolemia.
Homozygous
Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
The combination of ezetimibe and atorvastatin
or simvastatin, is indicated for the reduction of elevated total-C and LDL-C
levels in patients with HoFH, as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering treatments
(e.g., LDL apheresis) or if such
treatments are unavailable.
Homozygous
Sitosterolemia
Ezetimibe is indicated as adjunctive therapy
to diet for the reduction of elevated sitosterol and campesterol levels in
patients with homozygous familial sitosterolemia.
Therapy with lipid-altering agents should be a
component of multiple risk-factor intervention in individuals at increased risk
for atherosclerotic vascular disease due to hypercholesterolemia.
Lipid-altering agents should be used in addition to an appropriate diet
(including restriction of saturated fat and cholesterol) and when the response
to diet and other non-pharmacological measures has been inadequate. (See TABLE
7.)
TABLE 7 Summary of NCEP ATP III Guidelines
| |
LDL Goal |
LDL Level at Which to Initiate
Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes* |
LDL Level at Which to Consider Drug
Therapy |
|
Risk Category |
(mg/dl) |
(mg/dl) |
(mg/dl) |
|
CHD or CHD risk equivalents
|
<100 |
≥100 |
≥130 |
|
(10 year risk >20%) |
|
|
(100-129: drug optional)§
|
|
2+ Risk factors¤ |
<130 |
≥130 |
10 year risk 10-20%: ≥130
|
|
(10 year risk ≤20%) |
|
|
10 year risk <10%: ≥160
|
|
0-1 Risk factor¶ |
<160 |
≥160 |
≥190 |
| |
|
|
(160-189: LDL-lowering drug optional)
|
|
*
Therapeutic lifestyle changes include: (1)
dietary changes: reduced intake of saturated fats (<7% of total calories)
and cholesterol (<200 mg/day), and enhancing LDL lowering with plant
stanols/sterols (2 g/d) and increased viscous (soluble) fiber (10-25 g/d), (2)
weight reduction, and (3) increased physical activity. |
|
CHD risk equivalents comprise: diabetes,
multiple risk factors that confer a 10 year risk for CHD >20%, and other
clinical forms of atherosclerotic disease (peripheral arterial disease,
abdominal aortic aneurysm and symptomatic carotid artery disease).
|
|
Risk assessment for determining the 10 year
risk for developing CHD is carried out using the Framingham risk scoring. Refer
to JAMA, May 16, 2001; 285 (19): 2486-2497, or the NCEP website
(http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov) for more details. |
|
§
Some authorities recommend use of LDL-lowering
drugs in this category if an LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl cannot be achieved
by therapeutic lifestyle changes. Others prefer use of drugs that primarily
modify triglycerides and HDL, e.g.,
nicotinic acid or fibrate. Clinical judgment also may call for deferring drug
therapy in this subcategory. |
|
¤
Major risk factors (exclusive of LDL
cholesterol) that modify LDL goals include cigarette smoking, hypertension (BP
≥140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medication), low HDL cholesterol
(<40 mg/dl), family history of premature CHD (CHD in male first-degree
relative <55 years; CHD in female first-degree relative <65 years), age
(men ≥45 years; women ≥55 years). HDL cholesterol ≥60 mg/dl counts as
a "negative" risk factor; its presence removes 1 risk factor from the total
count. |
|
¶
Almost all people with 0-1 risk factor have a
10 year risk <10%; thus, 10 year risk assessment in people with 0-1 risk
factor is not necessary. |
Prior to initiating therapy with ezetimibe,
secondary causes for dyslipidemia (i.e., diabetes, hypothyroidism, obstructive
liver disease, chronic renal failure, and drugs that increase LDL-C and
decrease HDL-C [progestins, anabolic steroids, and corticosteroids]), should be
excluded or, if appropriate, treated. A lipid profile should be performed to
measure total-C, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG. For TG levels >400 mg/dl (>4.5
mmol/L), LDL-C concentrations should be determined by ultracentrifugation.
At the time of hospitalization for an acute coronary
event, lipid measures should be taken on admission or within 24 hours. These
values can guide the physician on initiation of LDL-lowering therapy before or
at discharge.
ContraindicationsHypersensitivity to any
component of this medication.
The combination of ezetimibe with an HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitor is contraindicated in patients with active liver disease or
unexplained persistent elevations in serum transaminases.
All HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are
contraindicated in pregnant and nursing women. When ezetimibe is administered
with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in a woman of childbearing potential, refer
to the pregnancy category and product labeling for the HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor. (See PRECAUTIONS, Pregnancy Category C.)
PrecautionsConcurrent administration of
ezetimibe with a specific HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor should be in accordance
with the product labeling for that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.
Liver Enzymes
In controlled clinical monotherapy studies,
the incidence of consecutive elevations (≥3 × the upper limit of
normal [ULN]) in serum transaminases was similar between ezetimibe (0.5%) and
placebo (0.3%).
In controlled clinical combination studies of
ezetimibe initiated concurrently with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, the
incidence of consecutive elevations (≥3 × ULN) in serum transaminases
was 1.3% for patients treated with ezetimibe administered with HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors and 0.4% for patients treated with HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitors alone. These elevations in transaminases were generally
asymptomatic, not associated with cholestasis, and returned to baseline after
discontinuation of therapy or with continued treatment. When ezetimibe is
co-administered with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, liver function tests
should be performed at initiation of therapy and according to the
recommendations of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.
Skeletal
Muscle
In clinical trials, there was no excess of
myopathy or rhabdomyolysis associated with ezetimibe compared with the relevant
control arm (placebo or HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor alone). However, myopathy
and rhabdomyolysis are known adverse reactions to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
and other lipid-lowering drugs. In clinical trials, the incidence of CPK >10
× ULN was 0.2% for ezetimibe versus 0.1% for placebo, and 0.1% for
ezetimibe co-administered with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor versus 0.4% for
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors alone.
Hepatic Insufficiency
Due to the unknown effects of the increased
exposure to ezetimibe in patients with moderate or severe hepatic
insufficiency, ezetimibe is not recommended in these patients. (See CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY, Pharmacokinetics, Special Populations.)
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, and
Impairment of Fertility
A 104 week dietary carcinogenicity study with
ezetimibe was conducted in rats at doses up to 1500 mg/kg/day (males) and 500
mg/kg/day (females) [~20 times the human exposure at 10 mg daily based on
AUC(0-24h) for total ezetimibe]. A 104 week dietary carcinogenicity study with
ezetimibe was also conducted in mice at doses up to 500 mg/kg/day [>150
times the human exposure at 10 mg daily based on AUC(0-24h) for total
ezetimibe]. There were no statistically significant increases in tumor
incidences in drug-treated rats or mice.
No evidence of mutagenicity was observed
in vitro in a microbial mutagenicity
(Ames) test with Salmonella typhimurium
and Escherichia coli with or without
metabolic activation. No evidence of clastogenicity was observed
in vitro in a chromosomal aberration
assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes with or without metabolic
activation. In addition, there was no evidence of genotoxicity in the
in vivo mouse micronucleus test.
In oral (gavage) fertility studies of ezetimibe
conducted in rats, there was no evidence of reproductive toxicity at doses up
to 1000 mg/kg/day in male or female rats [~7 times the human exposure at 10 mg
daily based on AUC(0-24h) for total ezetimibe].
Pregnancy Category C
There are no adequate and well-controlled
studies of ezetimibe in pregnant women. Ezetimibe should be used during
pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the risk to the fetus.
In oral (gavage) embryo-fetal development
studies of ezetimibe conducted in rats and rabbits during organogenesis, there
was no evidence of embryolethal effects at the doses tested (250, 500, 1000
mg/kg/day). In rats, increased incidences of common fetal skeletal findings
(extra pair of thoracic ribs, unossified cervical vertebral centra, shortened
ribs) were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day [~10 times the human exposure at 10 mg
daily based on AUC(0-24h) for total ezetimibe]. In rabbits treated with
ezetimibe, an increased incidence of extra thoracic ribs was observed at 1000
mg/kg/day [150 times the human exposure at 10 mg daily based on AUC(0-24h) for
total ezetimibe]. Ezetimibe crossed the placenta when pregnant rats and rabbits
were given multiple oral doses.
|